Neville Chester is a senior portfolio manager with 28 years of investment experience.

Nicholas Stein is an analyst and portfolio manager with 16 years of investment industry experience.

PERFORMANCE AND FUND POSITIONING

The past quarter was marked by wild fluctuations in capital markets after the “Liberation Day” tariffs were implemented by the Trump administration and then put on pause. There was huge risk in markets where, if investors panicked, they could have captured all the downside and missed out on the recovery. Remarkably, despite a major turn for the worse in the war in the Middle East, markets have been strong ever since the US pressed pause on its radical tariff plans. SA also had its own particular issues, with the budget impasse and fears around the stability of the GNU scaring off investors, which subsequently reduced as the parties managed to pass a revised budget without the huge VAT increase proposed by the ANC. The Fund is very pleasingly up 15.1% YTD and our five-year return number is now 16.5%. 

Capital allocation is one of the most powerful drivers of shareholder returns. If one looks at the failures and successes on the JSE, ultimately, most of them come down to decisions made by boards regarding capital allocation. Signing off on mega projects, which always look good on spreadsheets, but in reality end up being poor decisions that earn returns well below the cost of capital, have caused immense damage. Contrary to that, careful allocation to projects with much margin of safety built in can create value for shareholders for many years to come. At Coronation, we have long argued that share buybacks are one of the most important capital allocation decisions that a board can make, and that this allocation should be considered alongside every adventurous capital expansion project. The benefit of a share buyback is that the risk is always substantially lower than any new greenfield expansion because you are investing into a business you know and understand well. There remains a narrative that somehow share buybacks are bad for companies and economies, which could not be further from the truth. If one is to compare the number of successful share buybacks to the number of successful expansion projects, the share buybacks win hands down. As to the economy, again the opposite is true. Share buybacks return capital to shareholders who can then employ it in investments where they do see profitable expansion opportunities. 

The subject of share buybacks is relevant as we have recently started to see the benefits from buybacks feed into a number of the companies we own. It has been a canny application of capital by management teams in an environment where the SA equity markets have remained lowly-rated. By buying back shares on attractive multiples, those shares are cancelled, meaning future profits and distributions will be divided by fewer shares, resulting in a greater return to the remaining shareholders.

Naspers/Prosus, over the last three years, have executed a continuous programme of buybacks resulting in 29% fewer Prosus shares and 27% fewer Naspers shares in issue, which has then leveraged up the overall return in the portfolio. Naspers is up 191% and Prosus up 155% over the last three years versus Tencent only up 61%. This has resulted in a meaningful contribution to our Fund’s return.

We have seen Nedbank buy back shares and, more recently, Standard Bank has also announced as part of their results that it has executed share buybacks for which management should be commended. Investec, over the past few years, very successfully bought back shares well below intrinsic value and has pleasingly again recently announced a further share buyback. Most recently, African Rainbow Minerals, a company we own because we believe the market is significantly mispricing its assets, has also announced a share buyback, with its management team taking advantage of the same mispricing that we have identified to add value by buying back its shares at a significant discount to intrinsic value. 

ABI, the global brewer, has taken advantage across the capital stack, buying back both debt and equity instruments at a discount to face value and intrinsic value, respectively. By buying back debt below par value, this reduces refinance risk and adds equity value to the balance sheet. At the same time, ABI has used the low rating on the share due to short-term concerns to buy back over $3 billion of equity, resulting in improved outcomes for shareholders as the long-term results recover. 

These actions are all indicative of boards and management teams that respect the scarcity of capital and who have applied this capital to the best risk-adjusted return option available. These actions have helped deliver the great performance that the Fund has achieved over the past few years. 

The fact that more than half the portfolio is made up of companies implementing share buybacks, reflects partly our respect for these capital allocation decisions and the governance driving it, as well as the conviction of our view that the shares are trading at large discounts to their intrinsic value since the boards of these companies believe share buybacks are one of the most effective investments to make.


Insights Disclaimer
Comprehensive fact sheet

Neville Chester is a senior portfolio manager with 28 years of investment experience.

Nicholas Stein is an analyst and portfolio manager with 16 years of investment industry experience.


More articles about:


Related articles